Legal Opinion

State, Department of Revenue v. Bonard Enterprises, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 10, 1987No. 86-2543PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s summary final judgment holding that appellee’s mortgage assumption agreement was not subject to documentary stamp taxes under section 201.08, Florida Statutes (1985), where, as here, there had been no release of the original mortgagor. We adopt the rationale of 1975 Op.Att’y Gen.Fla. 075-154 (June 3, 1975), which was as follows:

There remains a single written obligation to pay that is not increased and the assumption operates merely as additional security for its payment. However, when the assumption agreement releases the mortgagor, a novation has occurred with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Hialeah, Inc. v. Department of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Leadership Housing, Inc. v. DEPARTMENY OF REVENUEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alachua County v. Expedia, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2015
  2. Department of Revenue v. Sun BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. NCNB National Bank of Florida v. Department of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Alachua County v. Expedia, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2015
  5. Department of Revenue v. RaceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API