Richardson v. Yancy
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
This appeal is from a judgment rendered in favor of respondents, plaintiffs below, and *36against appellants, defendants below, in tbe sum of $2,624.45,. found by tbe trial court to be tbe amount due under the terms of a party-wall agreement made by the predecessors in interest of the respective parties in March, 1904.
The party-wall agreement, which was duly recorded, contains, among other things, the following provisions, which seem most strongly to bear upon the matters now in controversy:
“Whereas, the party of the first part is now contemplating the construction upon the east one-half of the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hoquarton Co. v. WinslowOregon Supreme Court · 1939