Legal Opinion

Jim Garvison v. Norman A. Jensen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 28, 1966No. 20068PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the portion of the judgment below which held that payments by appellee and other employers to the appellant Painters Pension Trust Fund and the appellant Painters Medical-Hospitalization Trust Fund were prohibited by section 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act. 29 U.S.C.A. § 186 (1964).

1. The district court held that both trusts violated the conditions for exemption found in section 302(c) (5) of the Act because both permitted the unions in their capacity as employers to make contributions to the trust for the' benefit of the unions’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blassie v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  2. Kroger Co. v. BlassieDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1964
  3. Local No. 688, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  4. LOCAL NO. 688, INTERNAT'L BRO. OF TEAMSTERS v. TownsendDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1964
  5. Jensen v. GarvisonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Jensen v. GarvisonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1967
  3. United States Trucking Corp. v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  4. Burke v. French Equipment Rental, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1980
  5. In re the Arbitration of Trustees of Operating Engineers & Participating Employers, Pre-Apprentice, Apprentice & Journeyman Affirmative Action Training FundsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API