Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'n

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1999Published

1ConcurrenceCastille, Justice

Due to the legislatively mandated limits on appellate review of Act 111 arbitration awards and this Court’s recent expansion of limited review to grievance arbitration awards, Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers’ Assn. (Betancourt), 540 Pa. 66, 656 A.2d 83 (1995), I am constrained to join the result reached by the majority. I write separately to express my extreme discomfort that the decisions of the arbitrators in the instant cases are beyond appellate review and to propose that the third prong of the narrow certiorari standard be expanded in grievance arbitration cases…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Washington Arbitration CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API