Spindel v. Shor & Associates, Inc.

*245No fair interpretation of the evidence supports the trial court’s finding that plaintiffs sold 40 images to third persons during the period that the licensing agreement was in effect at a price of $2,500 each, and that defendants were damaged by this breach of the agreement’s exclusivity provision in the amount of $100,000. At most, the record shows only that plaintiffs created images during the life of the agreement that they attempted to sell to third persons, and, if this be sufficient to establish a breach of contract, it is not sufficient to establish the damages, if any, caused thereby…