Legal Opinion

Batto v. Westmoreland Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1930PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.

The determinative facts are not in dispute. The plaintiffs recovered judgments in three negligence actions, tried together, against the Westmoreland Realty Company, Inc. (herein called realty company) and its chauffeur and codefendant, Wittschack. The two defendants appeared by separate attorneys. The realty company disclaimed negligence generally, and particularly disclaimed responsibility for Wittschack’s negligence, if any, on the ground that he was operating the realty company’s vehicle without authority from the realty company, on a personal expedition of his own. Wittschack asserted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barry v. . Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Abner M. Harper, Inc. v. City of NewburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Crowe v. . LewinNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Zenith Bathing Pavilion, Inc. v. Fair Oaks Steamship Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  5. Connor v. AllisonNew York Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sheridan Drive-In, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  2. United Fruit Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
  3. Invengineering, Inc. v. Foregger Company, Inc., and Lily M. Foregger. Invengineering, Inc. v. Foregger Company, Inc., and Lily M. ForeggerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  4. Burlingham v. HanrahanNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Buffalo Electric Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API