Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Morse

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2005No. 75915-4Published

1Concurrence

¶23 (concurring) — Like the majority, I would find the search invalid, but I use our established Fourth Amendment analysis to determine that Pam Dangel did not have authority to consent to the search of Robert Morse’s apartment.

Fairhurst, J.

¶24 We have expressly adopted the federal analysis under the Fourth Amendment for consent to search questions.6 State v. Mathe, 102 Wn.2d 537, 543, 688 P.2d 859 (1984) (citing United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 170-71, 94 S. Ct. 988, 39 L. Ed. 2d 242 (1974)). The Fourth Amendment generally prohibits the warrantless entry into a person’s home to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API