Stern v. South Chester Tube Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, District Judge.
The plaintiff stockholders have instituted this diversity action solely to compel the corporate defendant to permit them “to examine [its] share register, [its] books of account and records, the records of the proceedings of its shareholders and directors, and the books and records of account of its subsidiary corporation.”
The matter now before the court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter. The defendant contends first of all that the United States District Court has no power to grant relief solely in the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McIntire v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- McClung v. SillimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Rosenbaum v. BauerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stern v. South Chester Tube Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neuwirth v. MerinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967