Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Town of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 6, 1981Published

1Dissent

Lazer, J.,

dissents and votes to affirm the decree insofar as appealed from, with the following memorandum: I do not agree, as my colleagues apparently have posited, that a condemning authority which intends to put the property it takes to the same use as the owner did must pay for it on a *593summation basis at the condemnee’s option. The controversy here concerns not only the total amount of the award for the taking of a parcel known as the Malibu Beach and Cabana Club, but also how the award should have been arrived at. The property consists of 36.413 acres in the “Lido strip” between Lido…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. United States v. Commodities Trading Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. City of New York v. SageSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API