Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arch Insurance Co. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 2009No. WD 69806Published

1DissentHarold L. Lowenstein, Senior Judge

This suit for breach of contract deals with the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Progressive. This court reviews the record in a light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered and that party is accorded all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from the record. Cridlebaugh v. Putnam County State Bank of Milan, 192 S.W.3d 540, 543 (Mo.App.2006). This court reviews the grant of summary judgment de novo. In dismissing this appeal, the majority ignores this standard in favor of technical compliance to Rule 84.04.

If the facts here are enough to satisfy…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cridlebaugh v. Putnam County State Bank of MilanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API