Legal Opinion

Hankin v. Mintz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1980No. 2828PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment.

Appellees instituted an action in ejectment on November 18, 1977 to recover possession of the portion of their premises occupied by appellant.

*540Appellant answered and asserted that he was legally entitled to occupy the premises by virtue of an oral agreement with the co-owners (six of whom are named appellees).

After appellant’s deposition was taken, the appellees moved for summary judgment. The court, in granting the motion, held that the agreement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ritmanich v. Jonnel Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. KOTWASINSKI v. RASNERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Siegel v. EngstromSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Baker v. Lafayette CollegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Mattia v. Employers Mutual CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Community Medical Services of Clearfield Inc. v. Local 2665, American Federation of StateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Huffman v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Bersani v. School District of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API