Legal Opinion

United States v. Robin Sims

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 2, 2017No. 16-1696PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Circuit Judge.

This is Robin Sims’ second time before the court. On the government’s interlocutory appeal in 2014, we found that the district court’s 1 exclusion of DNA evidence as a sanction for the government’s late disclosure was not an abuse of discretion. The case then proceeded to trial, and a jury convicted Sims on all counts. Now, in Sims’ post-judgment appeal, he argues that the delay created by the government’s interlocutory appeal was a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. Finding no such violation, we affirm.

I. Background

We set forth a detailed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. Keith Anton SproutsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael SagutoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  2. State v. PetersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. United States v. Roger CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  4. Johnson v. NormanDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  5. Margie Lopez v. Nancy A. BerryhillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API