United States v. Robin Sims
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Circuit Judge.
This is Robin Sims’ second time before the court. On the government’s interlocutory appeal in 2014, we found that the district court’s 1 exclusion of DNA evidence as a sanction for the government’s late disclosure was not an abuse of discretion. The case then proceeded to trial, and a jury convicted Sims on all counts. Now, in Sims’ post-judgment appeal, he argues that the delay created by the government’s interlocutory appeal was a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. Finding no such violation, we affirm.
I. Background
We set forth a detailed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Keith Anton SproutsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Michael SagutoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- State v. PetersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- United States v. Roger CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Johnson v. NormanDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
- Margie Lopez v. Nancy A. BerryhillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.