Legal Opinion

Claim of Tate v. Estate of Dickens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1949Published

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

On April 7,1944, the employers, Fred Dickens, since deceased, and his wife, Effie Dickens, were the owners of an apartment building and rooming house in the city of New York. Claimant was employed by them as a janitor. As part of his duties he was required to look after the furnace in the building.

Claimant asserts that on April 7,1944, while he was breaking up clinkers in the furnace with a poker hot ashes were blown against his face and into his left eye. He attempted to remove the ashes from his eye and his wife gave him emergency treatment. As a result of the accident an infection…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. . Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Schenck v. . State Line Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Richard v. Credit SuisseNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Standard Oil Co. of Ky. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  5. Watson v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API