Legal Opinion
United States v. Dorigan
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 3, 1964No. 61-C-895PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
This is an action to recover a penalty of $250 for violation of the Safety Appliance Act, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-16.1-The violation occurred on June 8, 1961,. when the railroad was operated by Th& New York, New Haven and Hartford: Railroad Company, a foreign corporation. On July 7, 1961, the Railroad filed á pe-tition for reorganization under Section 77 of the Bankruptcy Act (“Act”) and on the same date, by order of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Bankruptcy Court), the Railroad was permitted to manage the properties and run the railroad as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McNulta v. LochridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Decker v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Maddux v. Gardner and MarbleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1945
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. President & Directors of Manhattan Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- In Re Michigan Brewing Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baker v. Southeastern Michigan Shippers Co-Operative Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1973
- People v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1978
- Village of Franklin Park v. OgilvieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Pereira v. PhillipsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1992
- Commonwealth v. BartlettDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.