Legal Opinion

James v. Brewster

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 15, 2006No. 2050297PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant Buster James appeals a judgment insofar as it (1) established the western boundary line of James's property; and (2) declared that James did not have an easement to use a portion of a concrete driveway on the property of the plaintiff Henry "Butch" Brewster. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

On June 9, 1997, Hubert Steadman and Carrie Steadman, a married couple, deeded to James a parcel of real property in St. Clair County. James's property was adjacent to, and generally east of, property the Steadmans retained. Both James's property and the property the Steadmans…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MotleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Ex Parte ShowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Atkins v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Neal v. NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Tidwell v. StricklerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. LefebvreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  2. Chancy v. Chancy Lake Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  3. Rearick v. SievingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  4. Thrasher v. ThrasherCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API