Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Tayse v. Baker Ross

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 2020No. 29684PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State ex rel. Tayse v. Baker Ross,

2020-Ohio-3014.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE EX REL. JAMES TAYSE Relator C.A. No. 29684 v. SUMMIT COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUDGE SUSAN ORIGINAL ACTION IN BAKER ROSS PROCEDENDO Respondent Dated: May 20, 2020 PER CURIAM. {¶1} James Tayse has petitioned this Court for a writ of procedendo to order Judge Susan Baker Ross to rule on a motion. This is Mr. Tayse’s second petition for a writ of procedendo; the first was dismissed because he failed to comply with the mandatory requirements…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Graham v. Findlay Municipal CourtOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. Henton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State ex rel. Ware v. Walsh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Robinson v. Fender (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Stokes v. CombsOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API