Legal Opinion

Minnesota Senior Federation, Metropolitan Region Mary Sarno v. United States of America Tommy G. Thompson , Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 13, 2001No. 00-3139PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOKEN, Circuit Judge.

The “Medicare q-Choice” program was enacted as part of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 and is now codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395w-21 to w-28. The program includes reimbursement provisions that encourage managed health care organizations to be cost-effective and to pass cost savings on to their members in the form of additional benefits or reduced charges. As under prior law, cost effec tiveness is measured by a formula based primarily on “fee-for-service” health care costs in each local community, an approach that results in substantial geographic variations. Though…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wieslaw Lukowski v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  2. Matthews v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. BeebeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. Matthews v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. HareDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API