Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Justus v. State of Colorado

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 20, 2014No. Supreme Court Case 12SC906Published

1Concurring in the judgmentJustice Coats

40 While I too would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, I do not join the majority opinion. Although for different reasons, I too would find that the statutes relied on by the plaintiffs do not offer to them a right to contract with the state; however, precisely for that reason, I do not believe either the federal or state constitutional limitation on the impairment of contractual obligations is at issue in this case. Finally, although I object to a number of things about the majority opinion, my fundamental concern is that by merely distinguishing the language and cireumstances of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Dodge v. Board of Ed. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API