Eyer v. Eyer

EUBANK, Judge.

This appeal is from a divorce action and questions the trial court’s lump sum alimony award and the determination that the: *32husband’s “pension plan” was not community property.

The plaintiff-appellant-wife, and the defendant-appellee-husband, were married in 1943, at San Antonio, Texas. At the time of the marriage, the plaintiff was 17 years of age and left high school without graduating and the defendant was 20 years old and an employee of Colorado Fuel and Iron Company, hereinafter CF&I. There were four children born to the marriage. All of them, except one, were emancipated…