Legal Opinion

In re Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. Securities Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 21, 2024No. 1:20-cv-08585Unknown

1Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: nna nese nna nese naan □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ KK DATE FILED:_02/21/2024 : 20-cv-8585 (LJL) IN RE TURQUOISE HILL RESOURCES LTD. : SECURITIES LITIGATION : MEMORANDUM AND : ORDER wane KX LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Defendants Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited (collectively “Rio Tinto”), and Jean- Sébastien Jacques (“Jacques”) and Arnaud Soirat (“Soirat” and, collectively with Rio Tinto and Jacques, “Defendants”) move, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.3, for an order granting reconsideration of the portion of the Court’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. Kassner v. 2nd Avenue Delicatessen Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API