Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boyles v. Kerr

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1993No. D-0963Published

1Dissent

SUPPLEMENTAL DISSENTING OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING1

[Filed May 5, 1993]

DOGGETT, Justice.

Today the majority reaffirms its recent reversal of the judgment for Susan Kerr. What has occurred here with the issuance of a revised opinion on rehearing is roughly comparable to Dan Boyles having erased those portions of the videotape featuring his friends making crude remarks, then replaying the remainder of the tape so damaging to Susan Kerr. Excising a few insensitive phrases in no way alters the insensitivity of the majority’s opinion.

Continuing to reject St. Elizabeth Hospital v. Garrard, 730…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API