Legal Opinion

RIGUEIRO v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 22, 2009No. 4D08-1073PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.

The defendant petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140, alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. For the reasons that follow, we deny the petition.

The defendant was convicted of four counts of sexual battery on a victim over 12 years of age and sentenced to 40 years in prison. 919 So.2d 688. He was represented by defense counsel on appeal. We affirmed without opinion on February 1, 2006, and issued our mandate on February 17, 2006. Two days prior to the issuance of our mandate, the defendant handed his pro se motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Logan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. State v. CravenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. State v. CameronDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. Robbins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BARRY MICHAEL SCHULTZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  2. Perez v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API