Legal Opinion

Fogel, Ltd. v. Shoemake

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 4, 1990No. 2-89-149-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAY, Justice.

In this case of first impression, the issue before us is whether the doctrine of parental immunity prohibits a third party from seeking contribution from a negligent parent in a survival action brought by the child’s estate.

Appellee, Janet Shoemake, is the mother of the deceased child, Miranda Gilley. As administratrix of the Estate of Miranda Gilley, appellee filed a survival action against appellants and was awarded damages. Appellants contend they are entitled to contribution from Janet Shoemake, individually, for the percentage of negligence assessed by the jury…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nolechek v. GesualeNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Mahnke v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Felderhoff v. FelderhoffTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Restifo v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Varela v. American Petrofina Co. of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shoemake v. Fogel, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Leehy v. Supreme Express & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Shoemake v. Fogel, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API