Legal Opinion

Latham v. de Loiselle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1896PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Minnie E. S. de Loiselle, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 21st day of June, 1895, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court after a trial at the Hew York Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

The plaintiff recovered a judgment at the Circuit upon a contract of guaranty executed and delivered by the defendant in Paris, France, to the plaintiff’s assignor.. The defendant resided in Paris, and the plaintiff’s assignor-was a merchant in that city, with whom the defendant’s husband had commercial dealings. Prior to. the establishment of the business relations referred to, the plaintiff’s assignor* required the defendant’s husband to furnish a guaranty in writing.to be signed by his wife, which was done, and the instrument is in the following words, according, to the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Arams v. AramsNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Banque De France v. Equitable Trust Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
  3. In re the Accounting of Van ArsdaleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Van KleeckNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
  5. Goodman v. Mercantile Credit Guarantee Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API