Legal Opinion
People v. District Court, In & for the Tenth Judicial District
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided August 31, 1981No. 81SA93PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEE, Justice.
In this original proceeding the People seek relief in the nature of prohibition pursuant to C.A.R. 21. We issued a rule to show cause why the relief prayed for should not be granted and now make the rule absolute.
On June 18,1980, a petition in delinquency was filed against R.G.G., age 15, alleging that he had committed the crime of second-degree burglary. Section 18-4 — 203, C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8).
Defense counsel for R.G.G. filed a motion to compel the district attorney to arrange for the administration of a polygraph examination of the key prosecution witness, the victim…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Robinson v. HanrahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF LARIMERSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- People Ex Rel. Hanrahan v. One 1965 OldsmobileIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- Myers v. District Court for Fourth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Platt v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- State v. LozaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. DIST. CT., IN AND FOR TENTH, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Platt v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009