Legal Opinion

MacKnight v. Sutton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1993No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Article IX, (§ 2 [I]) of the Town of Alexandria Zoning Ordinance provides that an appeal from a decision of the Planning Board regarding a site plan review shall be taken pursuant to CPLR article 78. The court properly affirmed the determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals denying petitioners’ application seeking review of a site plan by the Planning Board.

Supreme Court’s denial of petitioners’ motion to reargue is not appealable (see, Pennino v Lasersurge, Inc., 178 AD2d 939). Additionally, the denial of their motion to renew was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re BeinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Pennino v. Lasersurge Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Papelino v. PapelinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re of the Arbitration between Town of Evans & International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Crisafulli v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Heisler v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. MacKnight v. SuttonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API