Repara v. Beers
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, Chief Judge.
The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is DENIED and Defendants’ motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Legal Framework: Exceptional Ability Visas
The Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), as amended, provides for the issuance of visas to aliens “who are members of the professions holding advanced degrees ... who because of their exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, or business, will…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Northwest Motorcycle Ass'n v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estrada-Hernandez v. HolderDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Innova Solutions, Inc. v. BaranDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Sodipo v. RosenbergDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015