Legal Opinion

Appenzeller v. Black

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 2024No. 2024-0331Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 675.] APPENZELLER, APPELLANT, v. BLACK, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Appenzeller v. Black,

2024-Ohio-4456.] Habeas corpus—Appellant had adequate remedy in ordinary course of law and petition therefore fails to state valid claim for habeas relief—Court of appeals’ dismissal of petition affirmed. (No. 2024-0331—Submitted July 23, 2024—Decided September 12, 2024.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Richland County, No. 2023 CA 0067,

2024-Ohio-240. __________________ The per curiam opinion below was joined by KENNEDY, C.J.,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heddleston v. MackOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Norris v. Wainwright (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Stever v. Wainwright (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Bell v. McConahayOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  5. McDougald v. Bowerman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API