McCord, Condron & McDonald, Inc. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUGHES, Justice.
McCord, Condron and McDonald, Incorporated have appealed from the take nothing judgment of the trial court which denied recovery under a casualty insurance policy issued by Twin City Fire Insurance Company-
We affirm.
The trial was to a jury (which was dismissed by agreement at close of testimony.) The parties submitted the matter to the trial judge to determine the facts and the law involved.
The parties agreed and stipulated to the amount of damages (contingent on a recovery by appellants.) We are concerned with only one Point of Error. Did the trial court err in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. McKillipTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Buchanan v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Eulich v. Home Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Employers Casualty Company v. Brown-McKee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Roever v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dorchester Development Corp. v. Safeco Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Hartford Casualty Company v. Aubrey R. Cruse, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- T.C. Bateson Construction Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Mid-United Contractors, Inc. v. Providence Lloyds Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Gar-Tex Construction Co. v. Employers Casualty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989