Legal Opinion

Hewan v. Callozzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 18, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about December 5, 1994, which, insofar as appealed from, dismissed the action as to certain plaintiffs for failure to show serious injury as required by Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs’ claims that they were unable to resume daily activities for 90 out of the 180 days following the accident are simply not supported by any proof of confinement, incapacity, or other substantial curtailment of daily activities sufficient to make out a prima facie showing of serious injury (see, Licari v…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Velez v. CohanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Berete v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Nega v. Janella Cab Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Fernandez v. MercedesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API