Legal Opinion

Miller v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided July 25, 1974No. 73-1508PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from App. Dept., Super. Ct. Cal., County of Orange, dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state ban on obscenity is prohibited by the First Amendment, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would note jurisdiction and reverse the judgment.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Kenneth A. Plante v. Larry Gonzalez, Etc., Jon C. Thomas v. Larry Gonzalez, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Bloom v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hopfmann v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API