Feldman, Armon & Co. v. Lodge
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 295, Oct. T., 1918, by plaintiff, from order of the Municipal Court of Philadelphia, March T., 1918, No. 338, making absolute the. rule to strike off judgment in case of Feldman, Armón & Co. v. David Lodge, trading as D. Lodge. Assumpsit. Before MacNeille, J. Rule to strike off judgment. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. The court made absolute the rule to strike off judgment. Error assigned was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler, J.,
Plaintiff’s statement of claim was duly filed. Defendant entered a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient statement. This rule was discharged with leave to file a supplemental statement. The supplemental statement being filed, the defendant filed a suggestion in writing that the statement was not sufficient to require an answer. The plaintiff then entered a rule for judgment for want of an answer which rule was discharged by the court with leave for the plaintiff to file a supplemental statement. The supplemental statement being furnished, was again met with a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shannon v. CastnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Bordentown Banking Co. v. ResteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Gould & Co. v. Gage, Hitchcock & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Watkins v. JusticeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Commonwealth v. AckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Road in Hampton TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Jennings v. YanovitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934