Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Chicago & Alton Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Calloway Circuit Court.—Hon. D. H. Harris, Judge. (1) Tie shipment of mules involved in this suit was from the National Stockyards, Illinois, to Mc-Credie, Missouri, an interstate shipment, and is therefore governed by the laws of the United States and not by any law of the State of Missouri. Joseph v. Railroad, 157 S. W. 837; Railroad v. Miller, 226 U. S. 513, 33 Sup. Ct. 155, 57 L. Ed.; Railroad v. Latta, 226 U. S. 519, 33 Sup.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Calloway Circuit Court.—Hon. D. H. Harris, Judge. (1) Tie shipment of mules involved in this suit was from the National Stockyards, Illinois, to Mc-Credie, Missouri, an interstate shipment, and is therefore governed by the laws of the United States and not by any law of the State of Missouri. Joseph v. Railroad, 157 S. W. 837; Railroad v. Miller, 226 U. S. 513, 33 Sup. Ct. 155, 57 L. Ed.; Railroad v. Latta, 226 U. S. 519, 33 Sup. Ct. 155, 57 L. Ed.; Railroad v. Carl, 227 U. S. 639, 33 Sup. Ct. 391, 57 L. Ed.; Railroad v. Harriman Bros., 227 U. S. 657, 33 Sup. Ct. 397; Cau v.…

1Opinion of the CourtTrimble, J.

This is a suit for damages alleged to have been caused by negligent delay in the shipment of a car of twenty-four head of mules from the National Stockyards in Illinois to McCredie, Missouri. Plaintiff’s charge is that by reason of the exposure of the mules, caused by the negligent delay, two of them died from pneumonia, two others contracted a disease from which they afterward recovered, though in a damaged condition, and the remaining twenty lost weight and appetite, all to plaintiff’s damage in the sum of $750.

The answer denied this and set up that the shipment was under a written contract…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Cau v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Poor v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Bailey v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Cicardi Bros. Fruit & Produce Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Kolkmeyer v. Chicago & Alton RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Dunlap v. Chicago & Alton Ralway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API