Danzley v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for larceny of automobile; from Crisp superior court — Judge Gower. September 26, 1919.
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
1. The court did not err in denying the application for a continuance, which was based on the absence of a witness who had not been subpoenaed and who was not shown to reside within the jurisdiction of the court, but who, according to the best information obtainable by the sheriff in seeking to serve the subpoena, had left this State and enlisted in the United States Navy. Park’s Penal Code, § 987.
2. A ground of a motion for a new trial complaining as to the admissibility of certain evidence, but failing to set out the evidence as a part of the ground or to annex it as an exhibit to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cobb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Skipper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Pinkard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
- Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Greeson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Bridges v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Southern Railway Co. v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.