Legal Opinion

In re Kaufman

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1891Published

1Per curiam

At the present term of the court we had occasion to consider the question of the necessity of a surrogate making findings of fact in probate cases, (In re Peck, 14 N. Y. Supp. 899,) and it was decided that the provisions of section 2545 of the Code were mandatory, and could not be disregarded. In the present proceeding it appears from the record that the surrogate was expressly asked to make findings of fact, which he refused to do, making a record of his refusal, to which a formal exception was taken; and under the ruling we have made, above cited, (In re Peck,) it is clear the refusal of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re PeckNew York Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API