Legal Opinion

Wells v. Kreyenhagen

California Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1897No. Sac. No. 191PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. J. R Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

The defendants had judgment, and the plaintiff appeals therefrom and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Respondents object to the consideration of this appeal upon the ground that the record does not show that any of the papers appearing therein have ever been filed or used in the court below—except the notice of intention to move for a new trial and the notice of appeal—and that, as to the notice of intention to move for a new trial, it is not embodied in the statement on motion for a new trial. The record fails to show that either the complaint, answer, findings, or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. DohertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Mills v. DearbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Mix v. San Diego & Cuyamaca RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baldwin v. Santa Rosa Island Co.California Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API