Legal Opinion
Prager v. Glanzer
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 5, 1908Published
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. Action by Moses Prager against Abraham Glanzer and another. From a Municipal Court judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Per curiam
Plaintiff, a push-cart peddler, sues to recover damages for injuries caused by defendants’ wagon running into him while his cart was standing at Houston street. Defendant offered no testi*982many. The jury rendered' a verdict for $150. During the trial a witness was asked:
“Q. Did you have a conversation with Mr. Glanzer with reference to this accident? A. Yes, sir. Q.' What did you say to him, and he say to you? A.' I told him: ‘Mr. Glanzer, you know about the accident?’ Mr. Glanzer answered me: ‘Yes, sir; Mr. Prager, I do know about that, but still have noth- ■ ing to do with that, I was insured…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cosselmon v. . DunfeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Loughlin v. . BrassilNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Cunningham v. HeidelburgerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
- Cunningham v. HeidelbergerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905