Legal Opinion
Columbia Engineering International, Ltd. v. Dorman
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 17, 1980No. 8324PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIES, Chief Justice.
Sometime prior to March 1974, the Kirby Lumber Corporation (hereafter Kirby) acquired a plant (Evans Co.) across Highway 92 (east side) from its mill in Silsbee with the intention to build in its place a particle board plant. The consulting engineer for the plant was Columbia Engineering International, Ltd. (hereafter Columbia). The general contractor was Casey Enterprises, Inc. (hereafter Casey). McBride Steel Erection Corp. (hereafter McBride) was a subcontractor fabricating steel. Minnis Erection Corporation (hereafter Minnis) was a subcontractor and dismissed from the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Henry v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Bradshaw v. Baylor UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Palestine Contractors, Inc. v. PerkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Shenandoah Associates v. J & K Properties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Cypress Creek Utility Service Co. v. MullerTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Badger v. Symon, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- UMC, INC. v. Coonrod Elec. Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
- Payne v. Gould, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.