Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Tune v. Synergy Gas Corp.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 20, 1994No. 76294Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHolstein, Judge

I respectfully dissent from part IV of the majority opinion and the reversal of the trial court’s damage award. The majority overrules well reasoned and long-standing precedent vesting the trial court with broad discretion regarding the propriety of closing argument of counsel, excuses the appellant from seeking the most efficient remedy available, excuses the appellant from demonstrating genuine surprise resulting in an absence of opportunity to respond to an argument, and orders a new trial without properly determining whether the allegedly improper argument had a prejudicial effect. In…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hoover's Dairy, Inc. v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc./Special Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. v. McReynoldsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  4. Lester v. SaylesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. State v. HaleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API