In re Orologio

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 14, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

On this appeal claimant contends that the Commissioner of Labor failed to file his notice of appeal from the decision of the Administrative Law Judge within the 20-day time period specified in Labor Law § 621 (1). The Commissioner has failed to address this issue in his responding brief. According to the date stamp thereon, the decision of the Administrative…