Legal Opinion

(PC) Jones v. Arnette

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 1, 2022No. 1:16-cv-01212Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEREMY JONES, 1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS 13 vs. VASQUEZ AND LOPEZ BE DISMISSED FROM THIS CASE BASED ON PLAINTIFF’S 14 ARNETTE, et al., FAILURE TO EFFECT SERVICE (ECF No. 118.) 15 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 16 FOURTEEN DAYS 17 18 19 20 21 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 24 with this civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and the Americans with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Andrew John Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. George W. Sumner, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Wright v. OliveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API