Legal Opinion

State v. Hamill

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1851PublishedCited by 6 opinions

from the District Court of East Feliciana, Stirling, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Preston, J.

J. St. George Hamill was accused of assault and battery, and gave bond in the sum of $500, with KirJdand and Dixon as his sureties, to appear at the District Court for the parish of East Feliciana, in April, 1850, to answer to the charge. He appeared, and was tried and convicted on the 13th day of April. A motion was made for a new trial, which was overruled on Saturday the 29th day of April, being the last day of the term of the court. The accused and his securities were then called, and he not being produced, the bond was declared…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. KelleherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  3. Succession of Kerry v. Freed Realty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  5. State v. BordelonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API