Legal Opinion

Classic Properties, L.P. v. Martinez

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 30, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order entered February 22, 1995 reversed, with $10 costs, respondents’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the petition is granted, and landlord’s motion for leave to conduct disclosure and to strike the jury demand is denied as moot.

The submission below demonstrates beyond factual dispute the existence of a long-term (24 years), committed family-type relationship between respondent Martinez and the deceased rent-controlled tenant, entitling respondent to eviction protection under the succession regulations (9 NYCRR 2204.6 [d] [3]). The evidence, including…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Braschi v. Stahl Associates Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Classic Properties v. MartinezAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1997
  2. Uptown Realty Group L.P. v. BuffaloeCivil Court of the City of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API