Hotard v. Perilloux
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.
This is a damage suit for alleged violation by defendant of a right of drainage in favor of plaintiffs.
The six plaintiffs allege that in March, 1909, Arthur and Andre Floremond Borne sold to three of the petitioners a tract of land situated in the Parish of St. John the Baptist, being the batture portion belonging to said vendors extending from the river to the public road; the vendors reserved the right to install at the river pumps for the purpose of irrigation through the existing canal from the river to their remaining rear portion of prop*282erty; the right of drainage of the batture sold…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. Arkansas Southern R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Camors v. MaddenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- Powers v. FloranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852
- Dobson v. New Orleans & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weinberg v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Hotard v. PerrillouxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928