Legal Opinion

Pike v. Satterthwaite

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 9, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

It is well settled that where the language of a statute is plain, unambiguous and within the legislative power, there is no room for construction. In such case, Courts are obliged to give to the statute the exact meaning conveyed by its language, adding nothing and omitting nothing. Brown Bros. & Co. v. Wilmington & Brandywine Leather Co., 9 Del. Ch. 39, 74 A. 1105; State v. Foote, 5 W. W. Harr. (35 Del.) 514, 168 A. 245; Van Winkle v. State, 4 Boyce 578, 91 A. 385, Ann. Cas. 1916D), 104. It follows that the Court may not create an exception…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  2. Van Winkle v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1914
  3. Lewis v. Pawnee Bill's Wild West Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1907
  4. State v. FooteSupreme Court of Delaware · 1933
  5. Mays v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Makin v. MacKCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1975
  2. Levine v. LevineDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962
  3. State v. AdamsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1942
  4. In re Estate of Dee HansonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1962
  5. Norman v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API