Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Wingard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1962No. 15952PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

The suit in trial court was to cancel an alleged “mineral lease,” evidenced by three instruments, to-wit, a regular oil and gas lease, primary term 10 years, and two min eral deeds, contemporaneously executed on April 22, 1947 as part of the same transaction, between the same parties, and for removal of cloud from title; also to cancel two subsequently executed mineral deeds from Mrs. Wilkerson to the Johnstons, conveying an interest in the minerals involved in the earlier dated transaction. W. W. Cannon, appellant, had intervened, having purchased the land from original…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Dils CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Richardson v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Fink v. BrownTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  4. Delta Drilling Company v. SimmonsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Totah Drilling Company v. AbrahamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LCTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Alford v. KrumTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Barrett v. FerrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Hondo Oil & Gas Co. v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hendes v. GaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API