Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adams Const. Co. v. Adams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 30, 1950No. 6 Div. 921Published

1DissentBrown, Justice

The appellees in their application for rehearing make the following observation: “The Court in a ‘Per Curiam’ opinion holds that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the great weight of the evidence and J that the lower court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a new trial. The opinion does not attempt to point out wherein the evidence was insufficient.”

Murray Cahill, the first witness offered by the plaintiffs on the trial and for whose integrity and veracity they vouched, identified the contract between his firm and the Adams Construction Co. negotiated by his associates Floyd…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGar v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Myers v. EllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Kirkland v. KirklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. McGlaughn v. PearmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API