Commonwealth v. Stanley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ross, J.,
The appellants were convicted for a violation of section 801 of The Penal Code of 1939, 18 PS 4801,1 and for conspiracy. The case was tried by a judge sitting without a jury. After they were convicted and their motions for a new trial were refused, the appel*354lants took these appeals. The appeals are absolutely devoid of merit and we do not propose to prolong discussion of them. The appellants were fairly tried, they were represented by able counsel, and their motions for new trial have no substance in them.
This prosecution grew out of a series of charges and counter charges…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LehmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. WheelerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Commonwealth v. MoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States of America Ex Rel. Alvin R. Drew v. David N. Myers, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964