Legal Opinion

Knight v. Stickrath

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1988No. 88-1338PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

We must address two issues. First, whether Texas had the authority to grant petitioner a final release from his Ohio parole. Second, whether petitioner’s due process rights were violated when his February 17, 1983 parole was revoked as a result of his June 16, 1986 conviction for breaking and entering. We answer both questions in the negative and hold that petitioner is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus.

I

The Interstate Compact for the Supervision of Parolees and Probationers Act permits a person who is on parole in one state (the sending state) to residé in another state (the receiving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coleman v. StobbsOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. William R. Dillworth v. J. Hopes Barker, Chairman of Florida Probation and Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. GheeOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Humphrey v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. BevingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. PerezOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API