Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Greenspan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 12, 2000, which denied claimant’s application to reopen a previous decision of the Board.

Claimant was employed as a salesperson by the employer until he resigned after seven days. The record reveals that claimant initially received computer training when he commenced working for the employer, but requested and was given additional training when he was not satisfied with his level of proficiency. Claimant then resigned, stating that he felt he was not qualified for the position inasmuch as he is not computer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AronsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re the Claim of CaldaroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of SchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MatuszewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Claim of Prince v. Commissioner of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Claim of Prince v. Commissioner of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API